alexa Comparison of Hallux Valgus Deformity Evaluation on Printed Versus Digital X-Rays | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2329-910X
Clinical Research on Foot & Ankle
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Comparison of Hallux Valgus Deformity Evaluation on Printed Versus Digital X-Rays

Ehud Atoun*, Ezequiel Palmanovich, Zeev Feldbrin, Ronen Debi, Guy Fridman and Meir Nyska
University Children's Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 33, CH-4056, Israel
Corresponding Author : Ehud Atoun
University Children's Hospital Basel
Spitalstrasse 33, CH-4056, Israel
Tel: 00972537678722
E-mail: [email protected]
Received: September 21, 2015 Accepted: December 21, 2015 Published: December 29, 2015
Citation: Atoun E, Palmanovich E, Feldbrin Z, Debi R, Fridman G, et al. (2015) Comparison of Hallux Valgus Deformity Evaluation on Printed Versus Digital X-Rays . Clin Res Foot Ankle 3:177. doi:10.4172/2329-910X.1000177
Copyright: © 2015 Atoun E, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Related article at Pubmed, Scholar Google

Visit for more related articles at Clinical Research on Foot & Ankle

Abstract

Background: Evaluation of hallux valgus deformity was traditionally made on a printed X-ray image. In the last two decades, digital X-ray systems have begun to replace the analog images, and images are not routinely printed anymore. Clinicians have to evaluate X-rays on digital images viewed on the computer monitors. This study compares the intra- and inter-observer reliability of foot deformity evaluation on printed images with measurements on computer monitors with the guidance of dedicated software.

Methods: Fifteen pre-operative X-rays reports of patients who were candidates for a surgical correction of hallux valgus deformity, were evaluated by ten orthopedic surgeons. Each surgeon had two evaluation sessions on each modality, printed and computer monitor with the guidance of dedicated software.

Results: We found that the hallux valgus deformity evaluations on computer monitors had significantly lower inter- and intra-observer variations than the evaluations performed on printed images. This study validates the use of digital X-ray measurements on computer monitors with the guidance of dedicated software. for evaluation of hallux valgus deformity.

Conclusion: Clinician can use digital images with the guidance of dedicated software to evaluate for deformities without a need to print the images.

Keywords
Hallux Valgus; Digital X-ray; Printed X-ray; Computer monitors
Introduction
Hallux valgus (HV) is a complex, progressive deformity characterized by lateral deviation of the great toe and medial deviation of the first metatarsus. Epidemiological studies have found increased deformity incidence with age, female gender, and a marked decrease in incidence among populations that do not wear shoes [1-5].
Choice of treatment is determined in part by evaluating the type and severity of the deformity [6]. Measuring angles on X-rays is a component of this process. The evaluation is made by measuring specific angles on the X-ray, including the hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle I-II (IMA), distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA).
In the last two decades, digital X-ray systems have begun to replace the analog images. As images are rarely printed anymore, this new technology is affecting the traditional methods of measuring the deformity and might affect the evaluation the deformity and its treatment. The objective of this study was to compare the intra- and inter-observer reliability of hallux valgus (HVA), intermetatarsal (IMA) and distal metatarsal articular (DMAA) angles measurements on printed images against measurements performed on computer monitors with the guidance of dedicated software.
Methods
The study includes fifteen digital X-rays of patients, who were candidates for corrective surgery for HV deformity. Three cardinal HV deformity angle assessments were measured on each photograph by ten Orthopedic surgeons, the hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), and the distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA).
Each surgeon performed the measurements on the computer monitors and on a on the same images that were printed. An additional measurement was performed on the same images after 1 month. Measurements on printed X rays were made with classic goniometer while digital X-ray measurements were performed using dedicated software (TraumaCad ®, Brainlab, Petah tikwa, Israel). The software guides the user during the evaluation and calculates the angles measured (Figures 1 and 2).
Statistical inferences between the two variances were made by F test execution. Data were analyzed by statistical software R, version 2.7. The model was built using the command lme.
Results
The differences between the inter and intra observer variability of manual and digital measurements were statistically significant for all 3 measured angles. Figure 3 shows the differences between the digital and manual inter-observer measurements. The inter-observer variability in Hallux Valgus digital angle measurement was 3.76 degrees compared to 8 degrees in the manual measurements (p=0.0001). The digital and manual intermetatarsal angle measurements were 2.64 and 1.64 degrees respectively (p=0.0003), and the DMAA was 15.92 digitally and 5.43 degrees manually (p=0.0001).
The intra-observer variability of the hallux valgus angle digital measurement was 0.17 versus 4.49 in the manual (p=0.0002), inter metatarsal angle measurement variability was 0.06 digital versus 0.59 Manual (p=0.0009) and distal metatarsal articular angle different was 2.02 in the digital measurements versus 1.17 manually (p=0.21) (Figure 4).
Discussion
In recent years, hospitals throughout the world have replaced the analog imaging systems with digital systems. The X-rays are preserved in the digital archives (PACS-Picture Archiving and Communications System) and can be viewed on computer monitors. This creates a new situation for Orthopedic Surgeons who are accustomed to performing various measurements directly on printed X-rays [7-8].
Pique-Vidal et al. compared Manual measurements with a goniometer by an orthopedic surgeon to measurements of an experienced technician on digital images. They found that measurements made on digital radiographs were more reliable than those made with a goniometer [9]. Panchbhavi et al. compared computerized and manual measurements by a single surgeon found no significant difference between the two methods [10].
In our study, we compared measurements of three cardinal HV deformity evaluation angles manually to measurements performed on computer monitors. We found the on screen measurement of HVA, IMA and DMAA on digital X-rays performed by orthopedic surgeons with dedicated software o be more reliable than those using manual measurements on printed images as traditionally performed. The inter and intra observer variability of these measurements were lower with the on screen measurements (Figures 3 and 4) as compared to the printed images. All differences except for the intra-observer DMAA angles were statistically significant (p<0.001). An explanation of these differences might be guidance of the dedicated software, option to zoom in and out, adjust and manipulate the measurements easily on screen as the accuracy of digital angles calculation as compared to the manual performed by goniometer.
Conclusion
Clinician can use on screen digital images with dedicated software to evaluate foot deformities without a need to print the images.
References

 

Figures at a glance

Figure Figure Figure Figure
Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 8038
  • [From(publication date):
    March-2016 - Apr 25, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7956
  • PDF downloads :82

Review summary

  1. Sabastian McGrath
    Posted on Aug 29 2016 at 5:15 pm
    The article presents an interesting study that involves comparing measurement variability of digital versus manual x-Rays. The article develops adequately in all its parts, the writing is excellent and the clinical approach is the best science.
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

OMICS International Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version