University of Sciences, Techniques and Technology Bamako, Bamako, Mali
Received Date: April 06, 2017; Accepted Date: April 19, 2017; Published Date: April 27, 2017
Citation: Oumar AA, Abdoulaye A, Maiga M, Sidibé Y, Cissoko Y, et al. (2017) Adverse Drug Reactions to Antiretroviral Therapy (ART): Prospective Study in HIV Infected Adults in Sikasso (Mali). J Pharmacovigil 5:228. doi: 10.4172/2329-6887.1000228
Copyright: © 2017 Oumar AA, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Visit for more related articles at Journal of Pharmacovigilance
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the adverse effects of Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) in adult HIV-infected patients in decentralized setting of Sikasso, in Mali. Methods: This is a proactive study that took place from 2 January 2011 to 30 December 2012 at the Hospital of Sikasso (Department of Medicine). HIV-infected adult patients who have started ART at least 3 months before were included in this study to monitor the laboratory and clinical Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) for at least 6 months. The WHO classification of adverse drug reactions has been used to investigate the causality of antiretrovirals. Results: Women were the most represented with 58% of the cases. The most represented age range was 26-47 years with 73.6%. Of the 178 patients enrolled, 61.2% had an ADR. ADR were neurological (40.4%), digestive (35.8%), cutaneous (18.3%) and hematological (5.5%). Stavudine was the most incriminated molecule, in 24.8% of the cases. The WHO grade 4 classification of ART toxicity was represented in 3.4% of the cases. The WHO causality score of “certain” was found in 29.8% of the cases. Conclusion: Adverse effects of Antiretrovirals are frequent and could be life-threatening in short and long terms. Regular follow-up of patients receiving these triple therapies, and the associated complications, is essential. We recommend active surveillance of antiretroviral therapy to strengthen Pharmacovigilance in Mali.
Adverse effects; Sikasso; Mali; Pharmacovigilance
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or AIDS is the serious consequence of infection due to the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and is a major public health problem . In Mali, the prevalence of HIV/AIDS is 1.1% among people aged 15 to 49 with an estimated 66 392 people in 2012 . Antiretrovirals (AR) provide low viral load and maintain the immune system by raising the number of TCD4+lymphocytes. They reduce the incidence of complications, improve health and prolong patient survival . Knowledge about the toxicity associated with antiretrovirals has improved significantly with the accumulation of experience of long-term patient therapy combinations . Despite these successes, patients are still exposed to the toxicities of these antiretroviral molecules. The adverse effects of AR drugs are indeed a common reason for discontinuation of treatment in infected patients. More than 25% of patients discontinue treatment in the first year because of these effects . These adverse effects result in changes in biological parameters with often clinical manifestations , which can affect many organs of the body. The most common adverse reactions are dermatological reactions and Gastrointestinal (GI) disorders . Hepatic toxicity occurs in about one-third (1/3) of HIV-infected patients after initiation of therapy . Metabolic complications are frequently reported, such as lipodystrophy, hyperinsulinemia/hyperglycemia and osteoporosis, osteonecrosis associated with Protease Inhibitors (PIs), and lactic acidosis with Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NRTI) [7,9]. Dyslipidemia associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease is also reported in HIV-1 infected patients who receive ARV . Several other rare but serious adverse reactions are also reported: Anemia associated with zidovudine or Azidothymidine (AZT); Stavudin-induced peripheral neuropathy (d4T), toxicity of retinoids associated with protease inhibitors (pruritus and ingrown toenails) and hypersensitivity reactions associated with Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NNRTIs)]. All of these adverse effects can have a significant impact on patients' quality of life and adherence to treatment. Adverse events in HIV-infected patients are well documented in developed countries such as Belgium [11,12]. In Mali, very few studies on adverse effects and their management have been performed [13,14]. What motivated us in choosing this topic: The adverse effects of AR in HIV-infected adult patients and the evaluation of the management of these Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR)? Our goal was to describe the frequency, nature and nature of adverse events in a decentralized cohort of adult patients in Sikasso, Mali.
Our study was conducted at the Kénédougou Solidarity Research Center (CERKES). The study was conducted from January 2, 2011 to December 30, 2012. This was a prospective cohort study based on the records of patients infected with HIV and AR therapy. Each naive patient who was to receive antiretroviral treatment in the CERKES medical department had an individual medical record. This file included a part for the initiation of treatment and follow-up forms. After the first prescription of antiretrovirals, the patients were reviewed at D15, M1, M3 and M6. At each control visit, careful physical examination and examination allowed clinical events to be identified, including those related to the use of drugs. Systematic patient prescriptions included blood count, CD4 cell counts, blood glucose, creatinine, cholesterol, triglycerides, and transaminases. The study was performed only on patients meeting our inclusion criteria. These inclusion criteria were: patients aged 15 years and over; patients under AR treatment with CERKES; presence of adverse reactions after antiretroviral treatment or No. The Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) refers to adverse or unwanted responses or responses in humans when taking a recommended dose for prophylactic, diagnostic or therapeutic purposes. In our work, the ADR was the set of symptoms reported by the patient or reported by the physician and related to the use of AR. A sign was considered ADR if it appeared in the patient after the initiation of treatment, that there was not another obvious etiology to explain its occurrence and whether it was reported in the literature as Adverse Drug reactions possible of one of the molecules used. Intensive adverse drug reactions research was observed during the study. The WHO classification of adverse reactions has been used to investigate the causality of antiretrovirals . The use of antiretrovirals as a treatment for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) began in 1987 with the commercialization of zidovudine (AZT). Several other molecules of the same therapeutic class (nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors or NRTI) were then developed. Since 1996, two other classes of antiretroviral drugs, namely Protease Inhibitors (PIs) and Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NNRTI), have been introduced for the introduction of "highly active" therapies (HAART: Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy) improving the management of infected patients and significantly reducing patient morbidity and mortality. Antiretroviral therapy consisted of the following regimens:
Thanks to the many possible combinations, these molecules allow better control of the disease by reducing viral replication at an undetectable rate in the vast majority of cases (less than 50 copies/mL). However, these treatments still have many adverse effects and are incapable of eradicating the virus, requiring lifetime administration. The data were collected on survey forms and then entered and analyzed on the SPSS 16.0 software. Confidentiality was paramount; informed consent was always requested prior to inclusion in the study. The results obtained have been communicated to the administrative authorities of CERKES. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Faculty of Medicine of Bamako.
Our study involved 178 HIV-infected patients at CERKES in Sikasso. The most represented age group was 26-36, i.e., 41.6% of cases with an average age of 35.2 years and extremes between 16 and 62 years. The majority of our patients were female (57.8%) (Figure 1).
ADR versus 81.1% for patients without ADR. The majority of our patients had a CD4 cell count of less than 350 cells/mm3 with 89.9% in patients with ADR versus 84% in patients without ADR. Hepatitis, high blood pressure (hypertension) and diabetes were the associated conditions in patients with ADR against tuberculosis in patients without ADR.
The most commonly used therapeutic combination consisted of two NRTIs plus one NNRTI 97.3% in patients with ADR versus 100% in patients without ADR. The most common treatment regimen was the combination of D4T+3TC+NVP 60.5% in patients with ADR versus 65.2% in patients without ADR. The majority of our patients were observed 88.1% in patients with ADR versus 94.2% in patients without ADR. Some patients had a change in the regimen for ADR (14.7%) (Table 1). The majority of reported ADR were WHO grade 1 (43.8%) (Figure 2).
|Patients with ADR||Patients without ADR|
|CD4||Tranche de CD4||-||-|
|WHO clinical stage||Stade 1||1||0|
|Time of occurrence||Mean (day)||26.97|
|ADR: Adverse Drug Reactions; HTA: Arterial Hypertension; D4T: Stavudine; 3TC: Lamivudine; NVP: Nevirapine; AZT: Zidovudine; EFV: Efavirenz; TDF: Tenofovir; FTC: Emtricitabine; LPV/r: Lopinavir/Ritonavir|
Table 1: Patient characteristics.
The mean time to onset of ADR after treatment was 26.9 ± 42.4 days (1 to 180 days) (Table 1). In the first 7 days of treatment, ADR occurred in 10% of cases; 39% between 8:15 days; 51% after 16 days. Approximately 40% of ADR were reported before the first 100 days of treatment (Figure 3).
The causality of adverse effects according to the WHO score was used to determine a "certain" causality score in 29.8% of the cases (Table 2). The ADR were neurological disorders (40.4%) and digestives (35.8%) (Table 3).
|WHO Causality method||Total|
Table 2: Relationship between schemas and the WHO causality method.
|Types of adverse effects||Effective||Percentage|
Table 3: Distribution according to the type of adverse effects.
The D4T+3TC+NVP regimen was the most associated with ADR with 36.7% of the cases (Table 2). The management of the notified ADR consisted of: advices (85 patients, 78% of cases), symptomatic treatment (28 patients, 25.7%), change of a molecule of the treatment regimen (16 patients, 14.7%). Adverse Drug reactions were favorable in 108 patients (99.1% of cases). Only one case required follow-up. The majority of neurological disorders were unlikely (56%) (Table 4).
Table 4: Relationship between causality and adverse effects.
Our descriptive and analytical study with a prospective data collection was carried out to evaluate adverse effects in people living with HIV/AIDS under antiretroviral treatment at CERKES in Sikasso. Many difficulties were encountered: Changes in therapeutic protocol due to the withdrawal of the combination (d4T+3TC+NVP) on the Malian market, the irregularity of patients on visits, the temporary or permanent unavailability of certain complementary examinations: CD4, viral load in Sikasso. Despite these difficulties we were able to obtain the complete results of 178 patients under antiretroviral and regular treatment in follow-up. The sample consisted predominantly of women with an average age of 36.3 years versus 33.5 years. In Ghana, Lartey et al. found a female predominance in their study . This female predominance can be explained by the frequency of heterosexual transmission and the biological vulnerability of women with a larger contact area and a longer time. Similarly, women's socioeconomic vulnerability places women at greater risk of transmission. The difference between the countries of the North and South finds two explanations: On the one hand the predominant heterosexual transmission in the South associated with female vulnerability. On the other hand, the relatively high role of homosexuality and the use of injectable drugs in the North in the transmission of the disease. In Senegal, Etard et al. , found a sample of 404 patients on ARV with an average age of 37 years ± 6. Studies on the ARs of ARVs performed in Mali , Cotonou  and Iran  noted an average age of 35 years, 41 years and 36 years, respectively, with a female predominance. On the other hand, studies carried out in developed countries indicate a male predominance [20,21]. The pathologies associated with our patients were hepatitis, hypertension and diabetes. Guitton et al. found hepatitis influences on ADR in HIV patients . Tuberculosis was most prevalent in patients without ADR. Khalili et al, found cases of co-infections with tuberculosis in 8% ; Modayil et al. in 2010 found 39.7% of cases of co-infections with tuberculosis . Tuberculosis is a pathology that could be associated and be an additional risk. The mean CD4 count was 189.7 cells/mm3 vs. 168.9 cells/mm3. Our results are comparable to those obtained by Maiga et al.  in Mali, and those of Bennett et al.  in the USA. These data show a severe immunosuppression resulting from a very late diagnosis. Furthermore, there was no association between the level of CD4 and the onset of ADR (p=1.26). The most commonly used therapeutic combination consisted of two NRTIs plus one NNRTI. In addition, NNRTI based regimens have been widely recommended by WHO for African countries, in addition have demonstrated efficacy at least equal to that of IP based associations and the advantage of NRTIs is the ease of compliance due to the small number of tablets to be swallowed, a smaller proportion of long-term complications, mostly metabolic . Although effective, these molecules have a low genetic barrier, hence a higher precociousness of the emergence of resistant mutants. The latest recommendations in France advocate the use of a ritonavir boosted anti-protease in first-line treatment of HIV-infected patients due to a higher genetic barrier of protease inhibitors compared to NNRTI . Indeed, in our sample, the combination of d4T/3TC/NVP predominated in the prescription of triple therapy at inclusion. The frequent use of d4T/3TC/NVP was in line with the Malian recommendation for the care of people living with HIV in 2012 . Of the 178 patients, 61.2% had at least one adverse drug reactions. Khalili et al, respectively found 87.6% in their study . Clinical adverse effects of ARVs, mainly digestive disorders, have been reported during antiretroviral therapy by several authors [18,19]. The same was true regardless of age, history, clinical stage, and CD4 count at baseline. ADR had occurred in the average 26.9 days. Treatment of clinically evaluated ADR consisted of counseling (78%). Modayil et al., Khalili et al., found similar results [19,23]. Our study summarized the dominant complaints of patients and observations of physicians following antiretroviral therapy. It was not possible to account for the long-term complications of ARV such as lipodystrophy. It is currently described in Western countries as the most common adverse reaction. This is currently described in western countries as the most annoying side effect .
Some cases have been described in the African cohort studies . Our study provides guidance to guide young prescribers in an African context. Other authors have found similar results [18,19]. The frequency of ADR was significantly different according to the patterns used. In the majority of cases, ADR were observed at the beginning of treatment and were transient. The time of occurrence varied considerably depending on the nature of the ADR. Neurosensory ADR were the most frequent (40.4%) dominated by neuropathy. These results are consistent with those of Zannou et al. in France and Chiffoleau et al. in Cotonou [18,29]. The frequency of neurosensory disorders in our study can be explained by the use of stavudine in firstline. Antiretroviral therapy in accordance with national guidelines in Mali. Our results confirm those of several authors on the frequency of neuropathies and risk factors during antiretroviral treatment [31-33]. In other publications, it is the digestive (gastrointestinal) ADR that predominate, observed in 61.1% of patients in Tunis . The nature of the digestive disorders observed can disrupt patients' appetite and compromise their nutritional status and adherence to treatment. Gastrointestinal disorders therefore deserve special attention during the follow-up of HIV patients. In our study the digestive disorders were dominated by nausea. This result is similar to those obtained by [14,35,36]. Pruritus and rash were dermatologic disorders in our patients, these ADR were observed in patients under a protocol including Nevirapine. In a study of Coulibaly et al. on the clinical and biological tolerance of objective Nevirapine 17% of cases of pruritus . We noted that the regimen containing stavudine was the greatest provider of adverse effects. Stavudine was the origin of peripheral neuropathies that were often irreversible. This ADR was very troublesome for HIV-infected patients. Our results confirm those of several authors on the frequency of neuropathies and risk factors during antiretroviral treatment [31,33,38,39]. This observation indicates that the ADR, however frequent and inconvenient, were supported by patients. Oumar et al, in Mali found similar results . The compliance or adherence attitude adopted by these patients may reflect the fact that during the treatment consultation sufficient preparation was made to inform them of the possibility of ADR and the consequences of an interruption of treatment. The therapeutic interruption due to an ADR therefore remains very negligible in our study population 8.9% of patients. However medication jumps due to ADR are possible, but were not appreciated from the records. Agu and Oparah found 33.9% of changes due to adverse effects of antiretrovirals . The management of the observed ADR was a function of the severity of the symptoms. In response to minor grade 1 and 2 effects, attention was drawn to the non-serious and transient nature of the symptoms. Baudrant et al. found 88.6% of minor ADR . The favorable outcome following the treatment offered to patients with ADR is reassuring (99.1% of cases). This explanation was enough to calm the anxiety of the patients. On the other hand, when the effect was severe or persistent despite the symptomatic treatment a change of antiretroviral molecule was made. Similar results have been described in the literature [19,23,40]. We used the WHO causality score of adverse drug reactions to assess antiretroviral related causality. The score was "certain" in 29.8% of the developed Adverse Effects associated with Antiretrovirals. An Iranian study of the adverse effects of antiretrovirals used the same method of the severity grading of adverse reactions of antiretrovirals found a rate varying from 71.4 to 15.6% according to the types of adverse effects . In Mali, a study carried out in 2011 found a similar result .
The Adverse Drug Reactions of Antiretrovirals are multiple and can be life threatening in the short and long term. An ADR was frequently encountered during our work. The nature of these ADR was predominantly grade 1 and 2 according to the WHO score. The link between Antiretrovirals and ADR was safe according to the WHO scale. The management of ADR consisted of counseling in the majority of cases. Regular follow-up of patients receiving Antiretrovirals triple therapy is essential in order to detect and treat the complications associated with these therapies. We recommend the establishment of a pharmacovigilance system in Mali.
We thank all the patients who participated in this study. This work was presented at the Journées of the French Society of Pharmacology and Therapeutics P2T Angers 2013, Poster N° P2_233 and at the 13th Annual Meeting of International Society of Pharmacovigilance ISOP, Pisa 2013 Poster N° ISP3447:46. This work benefited from a financier from the University of Bamako, Mali.
Oumar AA, Dao S, Diarra M, Maiga M, Tulkens P wrote the research protocol and organized the data collection. Diarra M, Abdoualye A, Sidibe Y, Konate I, Sangho F, Dembélé JP collected the data. Tulkens P and Dao S supervised the research study. Oumar AA and Cissoko Y analyzed and interpreted the results of the study. Oumar AA, Dao S, Maiga M, Cissoko Y, Konate I and Tulknes P developed the manuscript. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.