alexa
ISSN: 2332-2543
Journal of Biodiversity & Endangered Species
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Tiger Image on Medicinal Plasters Serve as a Cue for Traditional Medicine Consumers

Zhao Liu1,2 and Zhigang Jiang1,2,3*

1Key Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

2Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

3Endangered Species Scientific Commission of People, Republic of China, Beijing, China

*Corresponding Author:
Zhigang Jiang
Institute of Zoology
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Beijing, China
Tel: 86-10-64807268
E-mail: jiangzg@ioz.ac.cn

Received date: November 13, 2014; Accepted date: December 16, 2014; Published date: January 05, 2015

Citation: Liu Z, Jiang Z (2015) Tiger Image on Medicinal Plasters Serve as a Cue for Traditional Medicine Consumers. J Biodivers Endanger
Species 3:142. doi:10.4172/2332-2543.1000142

Copyright: © 2015 Liu Z, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Biodiversity & Endangered Species

Abstract

In the past, Musk and Tiger Bone Plaster (Tiger Bone Plaster for shorter) was one of most common nonprescription Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM). Since 1993, China banned all trade in tiger bones and its derivatives in 1993. Musk deer were up-listed as Category I State Key Protected Wild Animal Species in China in 2002. The plaster manufactures changed the prescription of Tiger Bone Plaster and used synthetic musk and herb medicines and changed the name of Tiger Bone Plaster to “Musk and Bone Strengthening Plaster” but packages of some brands of the plasters still carry a tiger’s image on it. Thus, consumers still consider the plasters as “Tiger Bone Plaster” because of the tiger image on the package. To investigate the consumer perception and behaviors of “Musk and Bone Strengthening Plaster”, we surveyed 418 citizens in Beijing in 2014. We found that 43.78% of respondents alleged that they had used “Tiger Bone Plaster”. When we inquired, almost all of respondents confirmed that the plasters they had used were “Musk and Bone Strengthening Plaster”. Presumably, tiger’s image on the plaster package produces a conditional stimulus to the consumers. Consumers preferred buying the plasters packed with tiger’s image printed on the package. In fact, no people had really consumed Tiger Bone Plaster in this investigation. For the sake of protecting tigers, we argue the manufacturers to remove the tiger image from the “Musk and Bone Strengthening Plaster” according to the regulations of CITES.

Keywords

Conditional stimulus; Consumer perception and preference; “Tiger Bone Plaster”; Tiger’s image

Introduction

Due to the habitat loss and fragmentation, coupled with depletion in prey and continued illegal poaching, the tiger habitat has shrunk by as much as 41% during the past 10 years and wild tigers occur in just 7% of their history range [1]. Currently, there are only about 3, 000 wild tigers (Panthera tigris ) in the world and the populations are still decreasing [2]. Illegal trade in tiger bones for traditional medicine and skins for ornamentation and collection are threats to wild tigers [2-5]. All tigers and other Asian big cat species are listed in Appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), and that commercial international trade has been prohibited since 1975 [6]. Tigers should not be bred for trade in their parts and derivatives [7].

Musk and Tiger Bone Plaster (Tiger Bone Plaster for shorter) was one of most common non-prescription Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) for treating traumatic injure and rheumatism in TCM market. In 1993 China banned all trade of tiger bones and the plaster manufactures stopped using tiger bone and musk as ingredients of the Tiger Bone Plaster, which was renamed the “Musk and Bone Strengthening Plaster” [8]. Plaster manufactures instead used synthetic musk and herb medicines in the “Musk and Bone Strengthening Plaster” ever since. After the trade ban on Tiger Bone and Rhino Horn, a significant legal industry in tiger bones and medicines made from tiger bones was closed down in China [3,9,10]. Of 663 pharmacies and shops in 26 cities, only 3% claimed they supply of tiger bones [4]. Investigations on the medicine market and TCM producers showed that the trade in tiger bones had been effectively controlled [4,5,11]. A recent study on the TCM market indicated that the average presence of tiger bone stalls was only 0.8-1.4%, and all the operators know about related tiger bans or regulations [12].

An investigation on the consumption of tiger products in China showed that 38% of respondents claimed to have used “Tiger Bone Plasters”. It is common to find the tiger’s image on the package of plasters but the plasters did not list tiger bone as an ingredient because that would be illegal [13]. Since Tiger Bone Plaster was the most frequently used TCM contained tiger bones, and now “Tiger Bone Plaster” no long contains any tiger bone; the number TCM users who actually used tiger bones may be overestimated. Presumably, people were misled by the tiger’s image printed on the package. Then, what are the TCM users’ perceptions and consumption preferences on these plasters with tiger image on the package?

Materials and Methods

Sampling method and questionnaire design

We carried out a questionnaire survey in Beijing in July and August 2014. A stratified random sampling method was adopted to selected citizens who had lived in Beijing for at least 1 year and were over 18 years old [13-15]. First, we investigated that whether the respondents had used “Tiger Bone Plaster” or not; then, we inquired into the users of “Tiger Bone Plaster” whether the plaster they had used had a tiger image on the package. At last, we showed the users the packages of different kinds of “Musk and Bone Strengthening Plaster” brands (Supplementary Figure 1) and asked them whether the plasters they had used is “Tiger Bone Plaster”, or “Musk and Bone Strengthening Plaster” or something like that. If at the beginning the respondents alleged that they had used “Tiger Bone Plaster”, but then they confirmed that the “Plaster” they had used was “Musk and Bone Strengthening Plaster” or something like that, we will ask them why the answers to this question were inconsistent.

Consumption scenarios

We designed 2 consumption scenarios by adopting stated preference techniques to explore the preferences of respondents [15,16]. Before answering the questions, respondents were asked to recall actual past experiences of purchasing or using non-prescription medicine products and imagine that current consumption scenarios were real. After that, the respondents were asked to imagine that they were suffering from a pain and feeling discomfort, thus they might need to buy medicinal plasters for treatment. In scenario 1: there were 8 kinds of “Musk and Bone Strengthening Plasters” available to choose, and 4 of them were packed with tiger images on the packages, and the rest did not have tiger images. In scenario 2: there were 8 kinds of plasters available to choose, and 4 of them named “Musk and Bone Strengthening Plaster”, and the rest named “Musk and Tiger Bone Plaster” (Supplementary Figure 1).

Results

The results showed that a total of 43.78% respondents (418) alleged that they had used “Tiger Bone Plasters”. 97.81% (179) of the users claimed that they had found a tiger’s image printed on the package of “Tiger Bone Plasters” that they had used. In particular, 91.26% (167) of users confirmed that the “Tiger Bone Plasters” they had used were “Musk and Bone Strengthening Plaster” or other kinds of plasters, rather than “Tiger Bone Plasters”. Although only 1.64% (3) user alleged that the plasters they had used were “Tiger Bone Plaster”, they were unsure whether the products used actually contain tiger ingredients. There were few, even no people had really consumed the medicinal plasters which contain tiger bone as ingredient. Theses consumers were misled by the image of tiger on the package. Furthermore, the results showed that there more people would choose plasters printed with tiger images (0.24±0.04) than those without tiger images (0.10±0.03) in scenario 1 (t =2.553, df =6, P =0.043<0.05), there were no significant differences between the selection frequencies of “Musk and Bone Strengthening Plaster” (0.20±0.02) and “Musk and Tiger Bone Plaster” (0.14±0.03) (t =-1.499, df =6, P =0.185>0.05). People have a preference for plasters with tiger’s image because the image made them recall the old “Tiger Bone Plaster”, though 61.72% of the respondents thought that tiger’s image was used as a brand symbol.

Discussion

Tiger’s image on the plaster produced a habitual thinking and even a conditional stimulus that tiger image was associated with the “Tiger Bone Plaster”. Consumers were misled by the tiger’s image printed on the package. Conditional stimuli consist of consumption objects such as brand [17]. More than 40 percent of respondents had used “Musk and Bone Strengthening Plaster” in this study, thus whether the plaster really contained tiger bone or not, consumer will still use the plasters.

Tiger bone was believed to be more effective in ancient tenets of TCM [4,13,18,19]. Tiger image is a famous brand; it takes advantage of “brand effect” to use the tiger’s image on plasters [13]. The tiger image relieves consumers’ memories of “tiger bone”, fosters and reinforces a habitual thinking of consumers that the plasters still contain tiger bone as ingredients. Conditional stimulus may consist of a new brand that carry an image belong to a famous brand [17]. For the sake of protecting tigers and deterring consumption motivations that triggered tiger poaching and illegal trade, the manufacturers should remove the tiger image from the “Musk and Bone Strengthening Plaster” and related products according to the regulations of CITES [6,20].

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Knowledge Innovation Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KSCX2-EW-Z-4) and the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31372175). We thank all members of the Wildlife and Behavioral Ecology Group, IOZ/CAS and all investigators who participated in the investigation. We are grateful for the recommendations from the members of the expert panel for this project.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11390
  • [From(publication date):
    April-2015 - Dec 04, 2016]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7604
  • PDF downloads :3786
 
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

OMICS International Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
 
 
OMICS International Conferences 2016-17
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings
 
 

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

agrifoodaquavet@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

clinical_biochem@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

business@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

chemicaleng_chemistry@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

environmentalsci@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

engineering@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

generalsci_healthcare@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

genetics_molbio@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

immuno_microbio@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

omics@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

materialsci@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

mathematics_physics@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

medical@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

neuro_psychology@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

pharma@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

social_politicalsci@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2016 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version