Journal of Biodiversity & Endangered Species

ISSN: 2332-2543

Journal of Biodiversity & Endangered Species
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Population Viability Analysis of Black Rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis michaeli) in Lake Nakuru National Park, Kenya

Thuo DN1*, Junga JO1, Kamau JM2, Amimo JO1, Kibegwa FM1 and Githui KE3
1Department of Animal Production, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences, University of Nairobi, Kenya
2Departement of Biochemistry, College of Health sciences, University of Nairobi, Kenya
3Molecular Genetics Laboratory, National Museums of Kenya, Kenya
Corresponding Author : David Njoroge Thuo
Department of Animal Production
Kangemi, Nairobi, Kenya
Tel: +254-722680087
E-mail: david_thuo@yahoo.com
Received March 4, 2015; Accepted March 26, 2015; Published April 3, 2015
Citation: Thuo DN , Junga JO, Kamau JM, Amimo JO, Kibegwa FM, et al. (2015) Population Viability Analysis of Black Rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis michaeli) in Lake Nakuru National Park, Kenya. J Biodivers Endanger Species 3:150. doi: 10.4172/2332-2543.1000150
Copyright: © 2015 Thou DN, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Related article at
DownloadPubmed DownloadScholar Google
Visit for more related articles at Journal of Biodiversity & Endangered Species
 

Abstract

Drastic decline of the black rhinoceros population both in numbers and range distribution have created a puzzle on its long term survival. We developed simulation models to identify crucial anthropogenic parameters that are essential for the successful development of conservation actions of this species in Lake Nakuru National Park under different scenarios. The roles of multiple anthropogenic parameters were evaluated to assess changes affecting population declines and extinction risk. Population Viability Analysis (PVA) simulations were done using individualbased program. A baseline simulation allowed for the assessment of the status of the species based on estimates of extinction risk and population declines under current conditions of abundance and habitat availability. The baseline simulation showed that Lake Nakuru National Park subpopulation has 0.00 probability of extinction during the next seventy five years. However, continuing threats, including declines in abundance and browse unavailability, make this species highly vulnerable to any change. Sensitivity analysis of anthropogenic impacts showed that small increases in habitat loss (2%) and population harvesting (3%) had drastic effects on population decline with a 100% probability of extinction. Our findings shows the need for conservation actions aimed at preventing poaching activities, modulating translocation programs and promoting the conservation of available black rhino habitats.

Keywords
Anthropogenic factors; Black rhinoceros; Critically endangered; Kenya; PVA
Introduction
Historically, vast populations of large wildlife mammals traversed throughout most of the sub-Saharan Africa, providing substantial resources and economic income [1]. However, during the past few decades; habitat loss, diseases, overexploitation and poaching have decimated a majority of these mega herbivore species to the extent that they are now restricted to protected areas [2].
The black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis ), hereafter referred to as black rhino, has suffered one of the most dramatic decline of all mammals in the recent history [3]. The species currently categorized as critically endangered under the criteria of the International Union of Conservation for the Nature Red List [4] is believed to have thrived in excess of hundreds of thousands only a century ago [5]. By 1992 the number were globally decimated to a low population size of approximately 2300 individuals [5,6]. In Kenya alone black rhino numbers decreased catastrophically from an estimated 20,000 individuals in 1970 to 398 in 1991 and to about 631 in 2014 [7]. This drastic decline has mainly been attributed to poaching.
It is well established that when populations become small and isolated; genetic, demographic, and environmental stochasticities increase the probability of extinction, making population more vulnerable [8,9]. On the contrary, large populations are more likely to be irrepressible to stochastic changes given that random events among individuals are less prominent within larger groups [10,11]. Consequently, conservationists have defined the concept of Minimum Viable Population (MVP) in an effort to characterize a quantifiable measure of extinction risk. MVP estimates the minimum number of individuals in a population that has a given probability of surviving for a specified period of time [12]. Nonetheless, its applicability in conservation management has not been ascertained thus prompting the need for a quantitative analysis of the risk of population extinction.
As a result, population viability analysis (PVA) technique has been used to determine extinction risks and population declines [13]. PVA allows for the estimation of extinction probabilities by incorporating identifiable threats to population survival into stochastic models of the extinction process [14]. In addition, it predict the future size of a population, estimates the probability of a population going extinct over a given period of time and also it evaluates management or conservation strategies aimed at maximizing the probability of population persistence [15]. This renders PVA a useful tool in assessing population decline under different scenarios subject to demographic, genetic and environmental stochasticities [16].
Considering the strengths, limitations, and assumptions of the available programs for PVA we selected individual-based program VORTEX version 9.50 [17]. This program models the effects of demographic rates, environmental variation as well as other stochastic events acting on a population. In the present study, we used a fifteen years population monitoring data collected by the Kenya Wildlife Service to examine how anthropogenic factors such as habitat loss and harvesting affect the population decline of the black rhinos in Kenya. This study provides information that is essential for the successful development of conservation actions for the long term survival of this species.
Materials and Methods
Study area and input data
Lake Nakuru National Park (LNNP) is situated approximately 150 km North-West of Nairobi in Kenya’s central Rift Valley on grid reference point 36° 7‘E and 0° 15‘S (Figure 1) and covers an area of 140 km2. The mean altitude is 1759 m and average annual rainfall is 876 mm. The habitat consists of grassland, scrub woodland, acacia woodland, and vegetation characteristic of saline water ecosystems. Among other wildlife species the park hosts one of the largest populations of black rhino in Kenya with a current population of 60 individuals (33 males and 27 females). The park is also a major site for flamingos in Kenya [8]. We obtained data of the black rhino population for Lake Nakuru National Park from the Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS). Whenever specific data of black rhino sub population was unavailable in LNNP, information from other black rhino subpopulations were used from published and gray literature or records.
The input data used for the PVA is specified in Table 1. The species has a polygynous mating system reaching sexual maturity at the average age of nine years old (Unpublished, KWS), giving one calf per parturition. In order to satisfy ‘number of young per year’ which must be a whole number, a year was adjusted from 365 days (default) to 490 days. The gestation period of a rhino is 15.33 months (460) days [18] so as to enter a whole number (i.e. 1) instead of a fraction (i.e. 0.8), a ‘year’ was calibrated to reflect 490 days to accommodate one birth per year, plus an additional 30 days which is the minimum time required to become pregnant again. This was done to avoid over-estimating the number of births in the simulations. The adjusted year is referred to as the ‘gestational year’. Data on sex ration in the wild did not exist; nevertheless, the ratio was approximated at 1:1 based on KWS personnel observations at LNNP and formal discussions with other rhino experts.
The major reason for the decline of the black rhino in the wild is assumed to be related to poaching associated with the trade of horn for traditional medicine in Asia [19,20]. In addition, habitat loss [21,22] has likely played a major role in decreasing the availability of feeding and breeding sites.
PVA simulations
PVA simulations were performed using VORTEX, version 9.50 [16]. VORTEX uses mortality rates and calculates fertility based on the number of females and males in the breeding pool and the mean number of progeny per year. VORTEX models variability in the percentage of breeding; this means that the environmental variation in reproduction is incorporated as a standard deviation of the percent of females producing off-spring [23]. Sensitivity tests were performed to measure the impact of specific parameters on population decline. In all simulations, we used the baseline as a template changing the value of the specific parameter of interest (e.g. Carrying capacity and harvesting) for each alternative simulation.
Based on the apparent distribution of the populations all simulations were run over a 75 year period, using 1000 iterations to estimate decline, extinction probabilities and estimates of population growth rates. The following simulation scenarios were performed:
Baseline simulation: This simulation was based on current demographic data obtained for the species (Table 1). Complete input files for VORTEX are provided as additional materials. For the programs’ outcome comparisons we ran the baseline simulation for 50, and 75 years, each with 500 and 1000 iterations. Varied time periods were run to evaluate how much the year to year variation could affect predictions on extinction probabilities. Different numbers of iterations were tested to assess effects of parameter estimates on measures of variation, including standard errors and confidence intervals.
Anthropogenic simulations: Poaching (Modeled as harvesting) which has been and still is considered the most serious threats to the survival of black rhino species [3] for their highly valued horn in the back market was modeled. Harvesting of individuals 3 years and above (sub-adult and adults) over a consecutive period of 50 years was simulated to assess the effects of poaching on the population decline. Probabilities of extinction were assessed under different harvesting quotas including 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 5% during 50 and 75 years, respectively.
In addition, habitat loss attributed to the increased water level of the lake due to the recent rehabilitation of Mau forest which is the major source of rivers draining into Lake Nakuru was simulated. This increased water flowing into the lake has consequently reduced the browsing area for the black rhino as well as increase inter-competition for the available resources with other wildlife herbivores. Moreover, the growth of an invasive species (Solanum incunum ) has also contributed in increasing the rates of habitat loss (KWS, unpublished). A recent estimate of water level increase was 0.05% as reported by Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS, unpublished). To assess the effects of habitat loss, a series of simulations modeling water level increase and invasive species as a decrease in carrying capacity (K) over time. These simulations included 0.5, 1. 2, 3 and 5% decreases in carrying capacity each year.
Results
PVA simulations
The baseline simulation using all individuals resulted in a probability of extinction of 0.00 for the subpopulation over the 75 gestational years (101 calendar years) with a growth rate (λ) of 1.254 (Table 2). The subpopulation increased by 30% for the first 10 years of simulation and then stabilized for the remaining years of simulations.
As expected, population performance of black rhino in terms of decline and extinction probabilities showed varying fluctuating patterns under different percentages of habitat loss (modeled as decrease in carrying capacity) and harvesting, thus, increasing the probability of extinction (Table 2 and Figure 2). Simulation with 0.5% of habitat loss had a little effect on the subpopulation (Table 2 and Figure 3). Although, the difference caused was not statistically significant the final population decreased by 20% from the initial population size at the end of the simulation.
A 1% loss of habitat each year had a significant impact (i.e. 0.11) on the subpopulation decline, reducing the subpopulation size by 46% during the first 40 years and 66.67% after 50 years. As expected, 2% had even greater impact on subpopulation extinction, decreasing by 90% the number of individuals during the first 40 years of simulation and wiping out the whole population before the end of the 75th year.
Simulation with 3% and 5% of habitat loss had a more drastic effect causing the population to run extinct at 40 and 30 years respectively (Figure 2).
Harvesting different percentages of individuals during the first 10 years over a 75 year period resulted in slight population increase (at 0.5% and 1% harvest) while reducing the population of the other percentages of harvesting (Figure 3). Simulation showed that starting at 0.5% of harvesting, probability of extinction became significantly
Discussion
The eastern black rhino is a critically endangered species with abundance estimates of 800 individuals in the wild [24]. Like many other iconic species, its main threats include habitat loss and the illegal trade of wildlife trophies. Nonetheless, there is no quantitative information about the impact of these activities on LNNP black rhino persistence. Results of the PVA baseline simulation suggest that, under current conditions, the LNNP black rhino has a 0.00 probability of extinction over the next 75 years. This scenario is particularly so considering the high level of protection and adequate security to keep off potential threats. Moreover, high levels of genetic variation as reported by Muya et al. [25] could also be a contributing factor to the long survival of the species observed. However, growth rate estimates (1.254) did not reach the rate of replacement necessary to maintain the populations over a longer period of time, making the species more vulnerable to any change or threat. This suggests that the park may be maintained as a nucleus breeding site for the potential translocation or reintroduction to other rhino sanctuaries in Kenya. In order to achieve this goal however, the KWS rhino team would be required to formulate a more effective management program which targets on maintaining an effective population size as well as managing other wildlife herbivores in the park.
Sensitivity analysis on the effects of poaching and habitat loss under different percentages proved to be important limiting factors for the LNNP black rhino. A 1% loss of habitat per year reduced the population abundance by more than half in the first 30 years of simulation. As expected, 2% had an even greater impact on subpopulation extinction, decreasing by 90% the number of individuals during the first 40 years of simulation and wiping out the whole population before the end of the 75th year. These results were particularly relatable given that increased water level in the lake (habitat loss) raised the competition pressure from other herbivores depending on similar browse resources. The results are consistent with those of Landman and Kerley [26] that showed black rhinoceros population sharing habitats with other browsers in Addo National Park, South Africa may be limited due to resource competition. Competition for the available resources may also result in calf mortality rate as well as extending inter-calving interval thereby reducing the population growth in black rhino population [27]. The effects of poaching were tested through different harvesting quotas set during a consecutive 75 year period and indicated that a 3% rate of harvesting had a significant effect on the subpopulation over a short period of time. This result was also obtained by Soka et al. [28] in a study of black rhino where harvesting of 2 males and 2 females year after year showed a mean growth rate of 0.035 in the first five years, but the population declined considerably before becoming extinct after 45 years. Findings from the anthropogenic PVA simulations showed that poaching and habitat loss pose great threats for the long term survival of the LNNP black rhino, particularly given the constant pressure of illegal trade of wildlife trophies and continued increase in lake water levels.
Our results suggest there is need to implement effective measures to curb habitat loss as well as enforcing laws against poaching and illegal trade of rhino trophies. Overall, this study provides an initial step in assessing and quantifying potential threats affecting black rhino in Lake Nakuru National Park, Kenya, in terms of the potential effects of anthropogenic factors on a long-term survival of this species.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the Kenya Wildlife Service rhino team, particularly Mr. Linus Kariuki for providing significant amount of data used to run the PVA simulations. We thank RC Bett and EK Cheruiyot for their helpful comments and constructive suggestions. This study was supported by Prof Thomas Gilbert through the National Museums of Kenya.
References




























References





























Tables at a glance

image   image
Table 1   Table 2

 

Figures at a glance

image   image   image
Figure 1   Figure 2   Figure 3
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment
Share This Article
   
 
   
 
Relevant Topics
Disc
Disc Agricultural diversity
Disc Algal Blooms
Disc Aquaculture
Disc Aquaculture Nutrition
Disc Aquatic Ecosystems
Disc Aquatic Physiology
Disc Atmosphere
Disc Atmospheric Chemistry
Disc Atmospheric inversions
Disc Biodiversity
Disc Biodiversity & ecosystem
Disc Biodiversity hotspot
Disc Biodiversity management
Disc Biodiversity preservation
Disc Biodiversity restoration
Disc Biodiversity solution
Disc Biological Sciences
Disc Biological diversity measure
Disc Biosciences
Disc Biosphere
Disc Brackish Water
Disc Catfish
Disc Chemical Oceanography
Disc Climate change effects
Disc Coastal Studies
Disc Coastal Upwelling
Disc Conservation Biology
Disc Conservational biodiversity
Disc Conservational biology
Disc Coral Reef Ecology
Disc Coral Reefs
Disc Cryobiology
Disc Crystallography
Disc Deep Sea Fish
Disc Deep Sea Mining
Disc Disaster Science
Disc Distribution Aggregation
Disc Diversity and food security
Disc Dynamical Oceanography
Disc Earth Science
Disc Ecology
Disc Ecology and Migration of Animal
Disc Ecology protection
Disc Ecosystem-Level Measuring
Disc Endangered Species
Disc Endangered plants & animals
Disc Environment conservation
Disc Environmental Oceanography
Disc Environmental Tourism
Disc Environmental deterioration
Disc Environmental diversity
Disc Experimental Oceanography
Disc Fish Pathology
Disc Fisheries Oceanography
Disc Fisheries Sciences
Disc Forest Biome
Disc Forest diversity
Disc Gemology
Disc Genetic diversity conservation
Disc Geochemistry
Disc Geochronology
Disc Geomicrobiology
Disc Geomorphology
Disc Geosciences
Disc Geostatistics
Disc Glaciology
Disc Global warming protection
Disc Hydrologic
Disc Insect diversity
Disc Lake Circulation
Disc Leaf Morphology
Disc Life Sciences
Disc Limnology and Oceanography
Disc Marine Biology
Disc Marine Biotechnology
Disc Marine Chemistry
Disc Marine Conservation
Disc Marine Ecosystem
Disc Marine Ecosystems
Disc Marine Engineering
Disc Marine Fisheries
Disc Marine Isotope Stage
Disc Marine Mammal Research
Disc Marine Pollution
Disc Marine Reptiles
Disc Marine Science
Disc Marine Sediment
Disc Marine diversity
Disc Marine-Engineering
Disc Meridional Overturning Circulation
Disc Microbial Oceanography
Disc Microbial diversity
Disc Mineralogy
Disc Natural Environmental protection
Disc Natural resources & fossils
Disc Ocean Currents
Disc Oceanography
Disc Oceanography and Marine Biology
Disc Operational Oceanography
Disc Physical Oceanography
Disc Phytoplankton Abundance
Disc Plant diversity
Disc Population Dyanamics
Disc Reef Biology
Disc Sea Food
Disc Sea Grass
Disc Sea Surface Salinity
Disc Sea Transportation
Disc Seaweed
Disc Semiarid Ecosystem Soil Properties
Disc Shallow Water Equation
Disc Soil diversity
Disc Spatial Distribution
Disc Species Composition
Disc Species Rarity
Disc Species diversity
Disc Species extinction process
Disc Stratified Flow
Disc Sustainability Dynamics
Disc Sustainable Forest Management
Disc Threats to biodiversity
Disc Tropical Aquaculture
Disc Tropical Ecosystems
Disc Veterinary Medicine
Disc Wildlife
 
Recommended Journals
Disc Earth Science Journal
Disc Aquaculture Research Journal
Disc Marine Science Research Journal
Disc Ecosystem Journal
Disc Oceanography: Open Access Journal
  View More»
 
Recommended Conferences
Disc 5th Biodiversity Conference  
March 10-12, 2016, Madrid, Spain
Disc 3rd Geology Conference
March 10-12, 2016, Madrid, Spain
Disc Pollution Control  and Sustainable Environment Conference
March 10-12, 2016, Madrid, Spain
Disc 2nd Green Energy Conference
Nov 28- 30, 2016, Chicago, USA
View More»
 
Article Tools
Disc Export citation
Disc Share/Blog this article
 
Article usage
  Total views: 11779
  [From(publication date):
April-2015 - Sep 26, 2016]
  Breakdown by view type
  HTML page views : 8021
  PDF downloads :3758
 
 
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

OMICS International Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
 
 
OMICS International Conferences 2016-17
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings
 
 

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

agrifoodaquavet@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

clinical_biochem@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

business@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

chemicaleng_chemistry@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

environmentalsci@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

engineering@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

generalsci_healthcare@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

genetics_molbio@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

immuno_microbio@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

omics@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

materialsci@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

mathematics_physics@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

medical@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

neuro_psychology@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

pharma@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

social_politicalsci@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2016 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version