Journal of Vascular Medicine & Surgery

ISSN: 2329-6925

Journal of Vascular Medicine & Surgery
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Lip Reconstruction with a Palatal Mucoperiosteal Graft

Ran Ito*
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
Corresponding Author : Ran Ito
Department of Plastic Surgery, Unit 1488
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
Tel: +1-832-314-6514
Fax: +1-713-563-8041
E-mail: ranito.1978@gmail.com
Received July 16, 2013; Accepted July 18, 2013; Published July 20, 2013
Citation: Ito R (2013) Lip Reconstruction with a Palatal Mucoperiosteal Graft. J Vasc Med Surg 1:e110. doi:10.4172/2329-6925.1000e110
Copyright: © 2013 Ito R. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Related article at
DownloadPubmed DownloadScholar Google
Visit for more related articles at Journal of Vascular Medicine & Surgery
 

Abstract

To achieve complete lip closure, the lips must have sufficient and uniform thickness, which provides good aesthetic and functional results. There are many advantages to using palatal mucoperiosteal grafts for vermilion lip reconstruction: (1) the graft structure is anatomically and histologically similar to the vermilion lip, (2) donor site morbidity is less than that at other donor sites, (3) the color and texture match are good, (4) there is little postoperative shrinkage, and (5) the graft tissue is thicker than a palatal mucosa graft, helping ensure complete engraftment. This article outlines a novel procedure for lip reconstruction with a palatal mucoperiosteal graft.

Keywords
Palatal mucosa; Palatal mucoperiosteal; Lip reconstruction
Introduction
In the repair of lip defects, the reconstructive surgeons’ goals are to preserve lip function and achieve an aesthetically acceptable outcome. When choosing the type of repair, to the surgeon considers the defect’s size and location. Mucosal grafts, such as those taken from labial, buccal, and palatal mucosa, are typically used for lip reconstruction [1-4]. Free mucosal grafts have several advantages for lip reconstruction: 1) the donor structure is anatomically and histologically similar to that of the vermilion lip, 2) there is no donor site morbidity, and 3) good aesthetic and functional results can be obtained. The major drawbacks to vermilion lip reconstruction using free mucosal grafts are inadequate bulk in the reconstructed lip and reduced elasticity in the lips due to postoperative shrinkage of the graft and deformation of the grafted tissue. We previously performed reconstruction of the posterior lamella of the eyelid using hard palate mucosa with periosteum to compensate for the drawbacks of reconstruction with mucosal tissue only, and we obtained satisfactory results [5,6]. In this report, we describe the use of this palatal mucoperiosteal graft technique to vermilion lip reconstruction [7].
 
Case Report
An 81-year-old man underwent resection of a malignant tumor (squamous cell carcinoma) on the left side of his lower lip. The tumor was resected with ample tumor-free margins, and the defect, with minor commissural involvement, was repaired using Estlander’s method [8]. A commissuroplasty was performed 6 months later. A year after this second operation, the patient was referred to our hospital because of drooling and food spillage due to a depression in the left half of the lower lip (Figure 1). The depression had occurred because of insufficient lip tissue and contracture of the surgical scar.
Because the patient was elderly and the remaining amount of mucosal tissue around the lip was insufficient owing to atrophy, we decided that reconstruction with a local mucosal flap, such as a V-Y advancement flap, was not appropriate. We released the scar contracture and performed reconstruction of the lip with a hard palate mucoperiosteal graft. Part of the graft was denuded and buried under the mucosa to augment the height of the lower lip.
Ten days after surgery, the sutures were removed, and the patient’s jaw was released. There were no postoperative complications. The donor on the palate healed completely by 4 weeks (Figure 2). Follow-up at 6 months showed that the patient had perfect closure of the mouth without leakage of saliva, and the reconstructed lower lip had a normal contour (Figure 3). Favorable aesthetic and functional results were achieved (Figure 4).
Discussion
When selecting a graft for lip reconstruction, the surgeon must consider not only the graft’s texture match, but also its shrinkage rate, and donor site morbidity. Table 1 compares the free mucosal grafts commonly used in lip reconstruction. For my patient, a palatal mucoperiosteal graft was applied. The palatal mucoperiosteum is wet, stiff, soft, and flexible and has a texture similar to that of the labial mucosa. The postoperative shrinkage rate for a palatal mucoperiosteal graft is 10%, which is less than palatal mucosa only [9,10], because the periosteum contains dense fibrous tissue that supports the palatal mucosa, and the lamina propria is firmly attached to the periosteum by grouped collagen fibers [6,7]. This structure provides tissue stability and minimizes graft shrinkage as well as facilitating complete engraftment. Harvesting this graft is also easy, and there is almost no bleeding or donor site morbidity.
There are many advantages to using palatal mucoperiosteal grafts for vermilion lip reconstruction: (1) the graft structure is anatomically and histologically similar to the vermilion lip, (2) donor site morbidity is less than that at other donor sites, (3) the color and texture match are good, (4) there is little postoperative shrinkage, and (5) the graft tissue is thicker than a palatal mucosa graft, helping ensure complete engraftment.
Conclusions
Vermilion lip reconstruction with a palatal mucoperiosteal graft can produce good aesthetic and functional results. This type of graft should be considered as an option for reconstruction in patients with a functioning orbicularis oris muscle who require supplementation of the lip tissue.
References










Tables at a glance

image
Table 1

 

Figures at a glance

image   image   image   image
Figure 1   Figure 2   Figure 3   Figure 4
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment
Share This Article
   
 
   
 
Relevant Topics
Disc Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Disc Arteries
Disc Arteriosclerosis
Disc Blood Clot Symptoms
Disc Brain Aneurysm Symptoms
Disc Cardiac Arrest
Disc Cardiac Cachexia
Disc Cardiac Dysrhythmias
Disc Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Disc Cardiovascular Drugs
Disc Cardiovascular Drugs Market Analysis
Disc Cardiovascular Medicine
Disc Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy
Disc Cardiovascular Physiology
Disc Cardiovascular Safety Pharmacology
Disc Cardiovascular Toxicology
Disc Carotid Artery
Disc Cineangiography
Disc Congestive Heart Failure
Disc Coronary Heart Disease
Disc Cyanotic Heart Disease
Disc Emerging Infectious Diseases
Disc Endocrine Surgery
Disc Epidemiology
Disc Femoral Artery
Disc Gastrointestinal drugs and market analysis
Disc Gynecologic Surgery
Disc Heart Disease
Disc Hip surgery
Disc Hydrocele surgery
Disc Hypotension
Disc Ischemic Heart Disease
Disc Laparoscopic Surgery
Disc Laparotomy surgery
Disc Laser Surgery
Disc Liver Resection Surgery
Disc Liver surgery
Disc Liver transplant surgery
Disc Minimally invasive surgery
Disc Myocardial Infarction
Disc Neck surgery
Disc Neglected Tropical Diseases
Disc Neonatal Surgery
Disc Noncommunicable Diseases
Disc Oculoplastic surgery
Disc Oncologic Surgery
Disc Outpatient surgery
Disc Peripheral Vascular Disease
Disc Plantal fasciitis surgery
Disc Rheumatic Heart Disease
Disc Robotic Surgery
Disc Sciaticia surgery
Disc Stent
Disc Surgical oncology
Disc Thoracic surgery
Disc Toe surgery
Disc Transplant Surgery
Disc Trauma Surgery
Disc Tropical Biomedicine
Disc Tropical Diseases
Disc Tropical Fish Diseases
Disc Tropical Fish Medicine
Disc Tropical Health Nutrition
Disc Tropical Medicine
Disc Tropical Medicine Case Reports
Disc Tropical Medicine Research
Disc Tropical Medicine and Health
Disc Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Disc Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases
Disc Tropical Medicine and Parasitology
Disc Tropical Veterinary Medicine
Disc Varicose surgery
Disc Vascular
Disc Vascular Dementia
Disc Vector Borne Diseases
Disc Vitreoretinal Surgery
 
Recommended Journals
Disc Cardiovascular Research Journal
Disc Endovascular Surgery Journal
Disc Cardiology Journal
Disc Pharmacology Journal
Disc Surgery Journal
Disc Tropical Medicine Journal
Disc Current Research in Surgery Journal
Disc Cardiovascular Pharmacology Journal
  View More»
 
Recommended Conferences
Disc Medical-Surgical Nursing
Oct 10-12, 2016, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Disc World Congress On Vascular Diseases, Medicine & Surgeons Summit
October 24-25, 2016 Chicago, Illinois, USA
Disc Cardiology Congress
Oct 17-19, 2016 Rome, Italy
Disc Nursing and Healthcare
Dec 05-07, 2016, Dallas, USA
View More»
 
Article Tools
Disc Export citation
Disc Share/Blog this article
 
Article usage
  Total views: 11491
  [From(publication date):
October-2013 - Sep 26, 2016]
  Breakdown by view type
  HTML page views : 7744
  PDF downloads :3747
 
 
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

OMICS International Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
 
 
OMICS International Conferences 2016-17
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings
 
 

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

agrifoodaquavet@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

clinical_biochem@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

business@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

chemicaleng_chemistry@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

environmentalsci@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

engineering@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

generalsci_healthcare@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

genetics_molbio@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

immuno_microbio@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

omics@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

materialsci@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

mathematics_physics@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

medical@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

neuro_psychology@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

pharma@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

social_politicalsci@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2016 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version