Dersleri yüzünden oldukça stresli bir ruh haline sikiş hikayeleri bürünüp özel matematik dersinden önce rahatlayabilmek için amatör pornolar kendisini yatak odasına kapatan genç adam telefonundan porno resimleri açtığı porno filmini keyifle seyir ederek yatağını mobil porno okşar ruh dinlendirici olduğunu iddia ettikleri özel sex resim bir masaj salonunda çalışan genç masör hem sağlık hem de huzur sikiş için gelip masaj yaptıracak olan kadını gördüğünde porn nutku tutulur tüm gün boyu seksi lezbiyenleri sikiş dikizleyerek onları en savunmasız anlarında fotoğraflayan azılı erkek lavaboya geçerek fotoğraflara bakıp koca yarağını keyifle okşamaya başlar

GET THE APP

Crop Genome Editing: Advancing Crops via Editing of Their Genetic Make-Ups
ISSN: 2329-8863
Advances in Crop Science and Technology
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business
  • Editorial   
  • Adv Crop Sci Tech 2014, Vol 2(2): e112
  • DOI: 10.4172/2329-8863.1000e112

Crop Genome Editing: Advancing Crops via Editing of Their Genetic Make-Ups

Mariam Sticklen*
Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, USA
*Corresponding Author: Mariam Sticklen, Professor, Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA, Tel: 517-230-2929, Email: stickle1@msu.edu

Received: 24-Feb-2014 / Accepted Date: 26-Feb-2014 / Published Date: 28-Feb-2014 DOI: 10.4172/2329-8863.1000e112

Crops of the near future will be genome edited via a technology called “Genome editing with engineered nucleases” or GEEN, a technology that can add, remove or repair existing genes that might be not desirable such as genes that make crops susceptible to diseases, insects, drought, heat, cold or other biotic and abiotic stress factors.

For decades, molecular biologists have been using restriction nucleases or restriction enzymes to cut DNA at or near DNA specific recognition sites in order to study the crops DNAs or to genetically engineer crops. Restriction enzymes naturally exist in bacteria, evolutionally developed to provide a defense mechanism against invading viruses by selectively cleaving the viral DNA while the host DNA is protected by the methylase enzymes that block such cleavage in the host DNA. The GEEN technology mostly uses artificially engineered restriction nucleases that have been designed to make specific cleavage called double-stranded breaks (DSBs) in specific recognition sites of a genome.

The GEEN technology has been developed to repair the mutated sequences of human, animals and plant genomes. The double stranded DNA repair system either uses a set of enzymes to directly join the DNA ends of the DSBs or uses homologous sequences as templates for regeneration of missing DNA sequences at the break point of a genome. Therefore using the DSBs technology, one can repair mutated genes or add genes in a genome while using the host’s natural gene regulatory systems.

In case of adding genes to a crop genome, unlike traditional genetic engineering that randomly incorporates transgenes into a crop genome, the DSBs technology can precisely add a gene or even add multiple genes to specific site of a genome for trait staking so these multiple desired genes are physically linked assuring their co-segregation during the breeding of transgenic crops [1].

The RNA interference (RNAi) technology has been used during the last couple of decades to eliminate or reduce the harmful effects of mutated genes or reduce the undesired level of expression of a gene using transgene constructs containing the RNAi coding sequences as well as their regulatory systems [2,3]. However in DSBs, there is no need to produce transgene constructs containing the regulatory systems. Plants so far been genome edited include Arabidopsis [4-6] tobacco [7] and Zea mays [8]. To date, three classes of nucleases including Zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription-activator like effector nucleases (TALENs) and mega-nucleases have been developed [9-11]. Among these three, the mega-nucleases technology is preferred because unlike the first two, mega-nucleases technology causes less toxicity to the host cells. However, the toxicity of these technologies has been studied to be reduced to a minimum [12].

Certain mega-nucleases naturally exist in a limited number of specific microbes, but mutagenesis and high throughput screening techniques have been used to create different mega-nucleases that recognize certain DNA sequences [13]. Also, hybrid restriction enzymes have been synthesized [14] and a rationally designed meganuclease has been developed that can recognize unique sequences to be used as DSBs recognition sites [15].

A protocol was recently developed [16] and used for simultaneous real-time visualization of the whole genome editing processes along with screening for the genome-edited DNA at the same time via a technology called ”nanofabricated DNA curtains”.

Therefore, it is only a matter of time to advance the promising crop genome editing technology to solving of major crops biotic and abiotic stress problems by adding, removing or repairing of their specific genes [17].

References

  1. Urnov FD, Rebar EJ, Holmes MC, Zhang HS, Gregory PD (2010) Genome editing with engineered zinc finger nucleases. Nature Review Genetics 11: 636-646.
  2. Sticklen Mariam (2008)Lignin reduction and cellulose increase in crop biomass via genetic engineering. WO2008118385
  3. Park SH, Mei C,Pauly M,GarlockOng R, Sabzikar BDR, et al. (2012) Down-regulation of Maize Cinnamoyl-CoA Reductase via RNAi Technology Causes Brown Midrib and Improves AFEXTM-Pretreated Conversion into Fermentable Sugars for Biofuels. Crop Science 52: 2687-2701.
  4. Townsend JA, Wright DA, Winfrey RJ, Fengli F, Maeder ML, et al. (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genes using engineered zinc-finger nucleases. Nature 459: 442-445.
  5. Zhang F,Maeder ML, Wallace EU, Hoshaw JP, Justin P, et al.(2009) High frequency targeted mutagenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana using zinc finger nucleases. ProcNatlAcadSci USA 107: 12028-12033.
  6. Osakabe K, Osakabe Y, Toki S (2010) Site-directed mutagenesis in Arabidopsis using custom-designed zinc finger nucleases. ProcNatlAcadSci USA 107: 12034-12039.
  7. Karcher D, Kahlau S, Bock R (2008) Faithful editing of a tomato-specific mRNA editing site in transgenic tobacco chloroplasts. RNA 14: 217-224.
  8. Shukla VK, Doyon Y, Miller JC, DeKelver RC, Moehle EA, et al. (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases. Nature 459: 437-441.
  9. Esvelt KM, Wang HH (2013) Genome-scale engineering for systems and synthetic biology. MolSystBiol 9: 641.
  10. Puchta H, Hohn B(2010) Breaking news: Plants mutate right on target. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences107: 11657-11658.
  11. Puchta H, Fauser F(2013) Gene targeting in plants: 25 years later. Int J DevBiol 57: 629–637.
  12. Carroll D (2008) Progress and prospects: Zinc-finger nucleases as gene therapy agents. Gene Ther. 15: 1463-1468.
  13. Smith J, Grizot S, Arnould S, Duclert A, Epinat JC, et al. (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 34: e149.
  14. Chevalier BS, Kortemme T, Chadsey MS, Baker D, Monnat RJ,et al. (2002) Design, Activity, and Structure of a Highly Specific Artificial Endonuclease. Mol Cell 10: 895-905.
  15. Smith JJ, Jantz D and HelingaHW (2011) Rationally-designed meganucleases with altered sequence specificity and DNA-binding affinity. US Patent 8021867 B2.
  16. Lee JY, Greene EC (2011) Assembly of recombinant nucleosomes on nanofabricated DNA curtains for single-molecule imaging. Methods Mol Biol. 778: 243-258.
  17. McMahon MA, Rahdar M, Porteus M (2012) Gene editing: not just for translation anymore. Nat Meth 9: 28-31.

Citation: Sticklen M (2014) Crop Genome Editing: Advancing Crops via Editing of Their Genetic Make-Ups. Adv Crop Sci Tech 2:e112. Doi: 10.4172/2329-8863.1000e112

Copyright: © 2014 Sticklen M. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Top