alexa
ISSN: 2332-2543
Journal of Biodiversity & Endangered Species
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Biodiversity and Vulture-Canid Relations

Michael O'Neal Campbell*

Simon Fraser University, British Columbia, Canada

*Corresponding Author:
Campbell M.O'Neal
Simon Fraser University, British Columbia, Canada
Tel: 2508163784
E-mail: ecol55@hotmail.com

Received date January 1, 2015; Accepted date: January 2, 2015; Published date: January 12, 2015

Citation: Campbell MN (2015) Biodiversity and Vulture-Canid Relations. J Biodivers Endanger Species 3:e122. doi:10.4172/2332-2543.1000e122

Copyright: © 2015 Campbell M. et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Biodiversity & Endangered Species

Introduction

The dominance of some species over other less dominant competitors may reduce biodiversity, and the the comparative ability of the latter species to adapt is crucial area of study for ecology. Scavenging, a major ecological activity, attracts competitors within dominance hierarchies. Vultures, the dominant 'full time' or obligate scavengers, must compete with mammalian, 'part time' or facultative scavengers such as canids (members of the dog family, including wolves, coyotes, jackals and foxes). The success of vultures in such relations depends on their relative (compared with the facultative scavengers) size, strength and predatory characteristics. Vulture characteristics are dependent on their evolutionary history. There are two main groups of birds termed as vultures, the New World Cathartid vultures (possibly related to or evolved from storks, but this is still debated, ranging in North and South America) and the Old World Accipitrid vultures (related to or evolved from eagles and hawks, ranging in Eurasia and Africa).

The Cathartid and Accipitrid vultures have common and varied characteristics. Common attributes of all but two vulture species are featherless or nearly featherless heads/necks, obligate or specialized scavenging (rather than facultative or part time scavenging), soaring flight, and with scientific investigation, the possession of long intestines, strong stomach acids for the digestion of carrion and weaker feet than the predatory raptors [1-3]. The New World Cathartids differ from the Old World Accipitrid vultures in among others; thermoregulation (like storks, they defecate on their legs and feet for cooling purposes, termed urohidrosis); clawed but weaker feet [4]; different leg and pelvic muscle anatomy; and a comparatively weaker bill [5,6].

Vultures and Canids

In terms of the relationship between both types of vultures and other scavengers, an under-studied hypothesis is that the raptor-related ancestry of the Accipitrid vultures enables more eagle-like strength than that of the Cathartid vultures. It is possible that the former group has stronger competitive ability against scavenging canids. Canids are dominant facultative scavengers [7,8]. For such a comparison to be made, the canids used for comparison in the Old and New Worlds must be approximately similar in size and behavior. Similarly sized canids (coyotes and jackals) share the ranges of most of the vultures, hence a comparison of the ability of vultures to compete with them may reflect the relative strengths of the Cathartid and Accipitrid vulture species. Table 1 shows the comparative sizes of the large New World (in bold) and Old World vultures and the canids (the coyote is the only New World canid considered).

Vulture Length (cm) Wingspan (m) Weight (kg)
Andean Condor 100 - 130 2.7 - 3.2 8 - 15
California Condor 109 -140 2.5 - 3 7 - 14.1
Cinereous Vulture 98–120 2.5 - 3.1 6.3 - 14
Himalayan Griffon 109 to 115 2.6 - 3.1 8 - 12
Lappet-faced Vulture 78–115 2.5–2.9 4.4. - 13.6
Griffon Vulture 93–122 2.3 - 2.8 6.2 -11.3
Ruppell's Vulture 85 - 103 2.26 - 2.6 6.4 - 9
Cape Vulture 96–115 2.26–2.6 7 - 11
Canid Length body, tail (cm) Shoulder height (cm) Weight (kg)
Coyote 76 - 86, 30 - 41 58 - 66 6.8 - 20.9
Side-striped Jackal 69 - 81, 30 - 41 35 - 50 6.5 - 14
Black-backed Jackal 60 - 90, 26–40 30–48 6.8 - 9.5
Golden Jackal 70 - 85, 25 40 8 - 10

Table 1: Comparative sizes of the new and old world vultures.

The New World Vultures and the Coyote are from the Americas, the rest are from Eurasia and Africa. The coyote is dominant over the California Condor at carcasses [9,10]. A reintroduced condor was killed by a coyote [11] and coyotes among other predators are implicated in 18 condor deaths [12]. The relation between the jackals and the largest Accipitrid vultures (with a size ratio similar to that of the condors and coyotes) is more even than that between coyotes and condors. Black-backed and Golden Jackals in Africa and Eurasia “compete heavily with vultures” [13]. In some cases as well, the larger vultures may attack jackals at carcasses [14]. Lappet-faced vultures, one of the most aggressive vultures in Africa, have been filmed and recorded attacking and repelling jackals from carcasses [2,14,15]. There are no records of vultures killing jackals although martial eagles have killed Black-backed Jackals [16]. Golden jackals are noted to be aggressive competitors, and “can dominate even the largest vultures, and may hold dozens at bay while it monopolizes the remains of a kill, threatening, snapping, lunging with ears flattened and tail whipping from side to side, sometimes jumping into the air to bite at a bird that tries to land too close” [16]. As vultures may also dominate jackals, the relationship may also be termed indeterminate [17].

Conclusion

The evidence hints that the more eagle-like Old World vultures have a more equal relationship than the New World vultures with scavenging canids. Further study on this difference is important for three reasons. Vultures have declined in many Eurasian and African countries and canids (including feral dogs) have increased their scavenging role. Hence, a vulture population recovery must acknowledge the competitive role of canids. Also, as condor recovery programs are gathering ground in the Americas, the coyotes are possible impediments, possibly to a greater degree than jackals would be to old world vultures. Canids have a strong sense of smell and may precede vultures at hidden carcasses (condors and Old World vultures lack a sense of smell), hence when more visible carcasses are removed for sanitation purposes, conflicts may emerge between vultures and canids over the few remaining food sources. This encourages possibilities for detailed field research, which may increase our knowledge of the ecological relations of vultures and link the somewhat disparate studies of vulture evolution and biology with ecology and conservation possibilities.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11359
  • [From(publication date):
    April-2015 - Dec 07, 2016]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7606
  • PDF downloads :3753
 
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

OMICS International Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
 
 
OMICS International Conferences 2016-17
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings
 
 

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

agrifoodaquavet@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

clinical_biochem@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

business@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

chemicaleng_chemistry@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

environmentalsci@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

engineering@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

generalsci_healthcare@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

genetics_molbio@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

immuno_microbio@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

omics@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

materialsci@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

mathematics_physics@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

medical@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

neuro_psychology@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

pharma@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

social_politicalsci@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2016 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version